Principle of aggregating or seggregating money
The core of all finance
& investment activity
In all of
investment and financing activity, there runs a central theme. This theme is so
strong that it recurs in all investment classes, investment vehicles and is
central to any asset class investment as well as financing. This is “Principle of money
“aggregation-seggregation”
The
principle of money aggregation-segregation can be explained easily as follows:
“The
act of money changing hands for financing or investment purpose happens mainly to
suit the varied needs related to timing of money-flows, of each party to the
money transaction. This in turn has the impact of either breaking up
(segregating) money flows in different parts for one party to the transaction.
For the other party to the transaction it results in combining (aggregating)
money flows into a single part.”
An
investment or financing transaction in itself necessitates a change in pattern
of cash flows and will take place only if this primary objective is in line
with the needs of the transacting parties. The profitability merely makes the
transaction attractive and is a catalyst. The necessity or the main reason for the
transaction is the need to change the pattern of timing of returns. To
elaborate, let us look at the following:
1. Investing: This
is taken as an investment in an asset which will generate returns in future. An
investment decision is an offshoot of this principle. The act of buying any
asset is converting a single lump sum amount to result in either of these possibilities:
a. A lump sum cash flow in the future by
way of disposal (sale) of the asset
b. A periodic cash flow (or flows) in
between the purchase day to final disposal
OR a combination of the above
To compensate for this lag in time, an investor needs more nominal
amount of money later than what is invested now. The basic need to do this is
already present: to convert the lump sum available into an asset generating
flows later. Thereafter, it is the profitability of the investment, which helps
the buyer to decide the best way to fulfill the need.
Similarly, the seller of an asset needs a lump sum amount at
the time of selling the asset. The idea is to convert future streams of cash
flows / returns to an amount now. The seller’s decision to sell the asset is
based on this need. The seller’s outlook of lower time adjusted returns from
the asset in future (whether periodic or in lump sum) helps catalyze the
decision to sell.
The necessity or main reason for the transaction to happen
from view point of both seller and buyer is the need to change the pattern of
cash flows from this particular asset being transacted.
In the above transaction, one may say that the seller
undertakes to sell the asset not for his need for the lump sum amount, but to
invest elsewhere to gain higher returns i.e. the ultimate objective is higher
returns. However, as far as the particular transaction in question in
concerned, the need is to convert the timing of flow of money from this
particular asset to a way suited to the seller. The new investment will further
place this seller in the position similar to that of an investor, as outlined
above, with a need for converting lump sum amount to periodic cash flows (the
new investment being catalyzed by higher returns and the last transaction
catalyzed by lower returns).
Here we assume a rational investor as well as a rational
seller acting on a logical set of decision making framework & not acting on
whims and fancies or emergency/peculiar situations.
2.
Financing: One can put finances (in asset /business), by way of debt or equity. Even this transaction impacts the timing of
returns.
In case of a debt or loan being given, we first see the lender’s
perspective. The lender changes his lump sum amount to:
a. A lump sum cash flow in the future by
way of return of principle and interest
b. A periodic cash flow (or flows) in
between the lending day to final closure of loan by way of return of principle
and interest
(Or the above in various
permutations & combinations)
From the point of view of borrower, it is easy to see that he is taking a
lump sum now and parting with flows in future i.e. an inverse of the lender’s
position outlined above.
Similarly, in case of equity investments the equity stakeholder parts
with a lump sum and the recipient of equity money takes the lump sum cash flow
(parting with the stake in asset or business). In terms of understanding of the
principle, the other mechanics remain quite the same in terms of cash flows
arising out of loan.
In both cases of loan and equity finance, the catalyst (profit/ gain) is
similar though outlined a bit differently. The profitability generation, seen
alongside risk aspects, has different characteristics. In case of loan, the
profitability for lender (or cost by borrower) is defined by the interest. In
case of equity it is simply gain (or loss) by way of share in residual profits
after all costs, including interest costs.
As seen above, the act of money
changing hands for financing or investment purposes happens mainly to suit the
varied needs for timing of returns (in
terms of cash flow) of any party to the money transaction. The risks and
returns are at best either deterrents or catalysts.